【1940年舊相片出現未來人? 】
<P align=center><STRONG><FONT size=5>【<FONT color=red>1940年舊相片出現未來人? </FONT>】</FONT></STRONG></P><P> </P>
<P align=center></P>
<P><BR></P>
<P align=center></P>
<P align=center><STRONG>上圖是在加拿大博物館的1940's舊照片</STRONG></P>
<P><STRONG></STRONG> </P>
<P><STRONG>留意 太陽眼鏡 ,T shirt , 有帽運動外衣(紅圈部份), 手持數位照相機digital camera (綠圈部份),圖片中出現這樣一個人</STRONG></P>
<P><STRONG></STRONG> </P>
<P><STRONG>這些現代化的東西在1940 年那年代根本不可能出現 , 所以被認為可能是未來旅行者time traveler。 </STRONG></P>
<P><STRONG>附上原文如下</STRONG></P>
<P><STRONG></STRONG> </P>
<P><STRONG>“Reopening of the South Fork Bridge after flood in Nov. 1940. 1941 (?)”</STRONG></P>
<P><STRONG>It’s the short description for the photograph shown at the virtual Bralorne Pioneer Museum, from British Columbia, Canada. The image can be seen specifically on this page (scroll down to the middle), among other items of the online exhibit. Did you notice anything out of place? Or perhaps, out of time?</STRONG></P>
<P><STRONG>The man with what appears to be very modern sunglasses seems to be wearing a st<SPAN class=t_tag href="tag.php?name=amp">amp</SPAN>ed T-shirt with a nice sweater, all the while holding a portable compact camera!<BR>Internet people reached to the obvious conclusion: it’s a time traveller caught on camera on 1940! Finally, we have proof!</STRONG></P>
<P><STRONG>If the story seems straight out of a movie and the photo is in itself a great funny find, the most amusing thing i came up with while looking into this – as an Internet person, on the Internet – was the reply for a skeptical, or perhaps somewhat cynical comment on how spurious it would seem the idea that a time traveler would want to visit the reopening of a bridge in some small town in Canada.</STRONG></P>
<P><STRONG>Read this on Doc Brown’s voice: “Of course, because we know nothing happened there right? But if we are considering time travel, how can we know if in some other timeline something historical happened right there?”</STRONG></P>
<P><STRONG>Indeed! Once you consider time travel, everything changes. But before writing Hollywood scripts, let’s get back to reality and ask again: is the photo evidence of a time traveller?<BR>The sourceAs noted, the image is indeed available through the official website for Canada’s museums. It was part of the exhibit “Their Past Lives Here” from Bralorne-Pioneer, available to the public since <SPAN class=t_tag href="tag.php?name=200">200</SPAN>4. It was put online since February this year, perhaps before that. And the peculiar “time traveller” image was only noted as such in the end of March, when it was linked on main websites such as Above Top Secret and FARK.</STRONG></P>
<P><STRONG>Given the source, we would assume the photo is authentic, and correctly dated to c.1940. Indeed, an Error Level Analysis suggests the image was not digitally tampered with, or at least that if it was, the author was smart enough to normalize the error across the whole thing. It’s a good job, if it was a job. And again, given the source, we would assume it was not a job.<BR>So, how do we explain the man out of time?</STRONG></P>
<P> </P>
<P><STRONG>“重開南方水災後福克布里奇年11月1940年。 1941年（？）“ </STRONG></P>
<P><STRONG></STRONG> </P>
<P><STRONG>這是簡短描述的這張照片顯示，在虛擬布拉洛娜先鋒博物館，從不列顛哥倫比亞省，加拿大。</STRONG></P>
<P><STRONG></STRONG> </P>
<P><STRONG>圖像可以看到專門在此網頁（向下滾動到中間），在其他項目的網上展覽。</STRONG></P>
<P><STRONG></STRONG> </P>
<P><STRONG>你有沒有注意到有什麼不恰當？或許，沒有時間了？ </STRONG></P>
<P><STRONG></STRONG> </P>
<P><STRONG>該男子似乎是非常現代的太陽眼鏡似乎是身穿印T卹，一個不錯的毛衣，而同時持有便攜式相機！ </STRONG></P>
<P><STRONG><BR>互聯網的人達到了明顯的結論：它是一個時間旅行者於 1940年被捕的相機！</STRONG></P>
<P><STRONG></STRONG> </P>
<P><STRONG>最後，我們有證據證明！ </STRONG></P>
<P><STRONG></STRONG> </P>
<P><STRONG>如果故事似乎直接從電影和照片本身是一個偉大的有趣的發現，最有趣的事情，而我想出了這個尋找 - 作為互聯網的人，在互聯網上 - 是一個持懷疑態度的答覆，或也許有點玩世不恭的評論似乎是如何虛假的思想，一時間旅行者將要參觀的一個橋樑重新開放在一些小城鎮在加拿大。 </STRONG></P>
<P><STRONG></STRONG> </P>
<P><STRONG>閱讀這個文檔布朗的聲音：“當然，因為我們什麼都不知道在那裡發生的權利？但是，如果我們考慮時間旅行，我們如何能知道的話，其他時間安排一些事情發生了歷史性的權利嗎？“ </STRONG></P>
<P><STRONG></STRONG> </P>
<P><STRONG>的確！</STRONG></P>
<P><STRONG></STRONG> </P>
<P><STRONG>一旦你認為時間旅行，一切都改變。</STRONG></P>
<P><STRONG></STRONG> </P>
<P><STRONG>但在好萊塢的劇本寫作，讓我們回到現實，再次問：是的照片證據的時間旅行者？ </STRONG></P><STRONG>
<P><BR>該 sourceAs指出，圖像確實是可通過官方網站加拿大的博物館。</P>
<P> </P>
<P>這是展覽的一部分，“他們過去生活在這裡”從布拉洛娜先鋒，向公眾提供2004年以來。</P>
<P> </P>
<P>它被放到網上，今年2月以來，在這期間。</P>
<P> </P>
<P>而獨特的“時間旅行”的形象只是指出，例如在3月底，當它與主網站如以上絕密 FARK。 </P>
<P></STRONG> </P>
<P><STRONG>由於源，我們將承擔的照片是真實的，正確追溯到c.1940。</STRONG></P>
<P><STRONG></STRONG> </P>
<P><STRONG>事實上，一個錯誤級別的圖像分析表明沒有數字篡改，或至少，如果它是，提交人足夠聰明，正常化的錯誤在整個事情。</STRONG></P>
<P><STRONG></STRONG> </P>
<P><STRONG>這是一個很好的工作，如果它是一份工作。</STRONG></P>
<P><STRONG></STRONG> </P>
<P><STRONG>再次，由於源，我們假設它是不是一份工作。 </STRONG></P>
<P><STRONG><BR>因此，我們如何解釋該名男子沒有時間了？</STRONG> </P>
<P> </P>
<P>引用：<A href="http://tw.myblog.yahoo.com/jw!.BSjyMqBQUULyqadT26VrJ.w/article?mid=13136"><FONT color=#0000ff><SPAN class=t_tag href="tag.php?name=http">http</SPAN>://tw.myblog.yahoo.com/jw!.BSjyMqBQUULyqadT26VrJ.w/<SPAN class=t_tag href="tag.php?name=article">article</SPAN>?mid=13136</FONT></A></P>
頁:
[1]